Skip to main content

It's okay to fail...

One of the things I had mentioned in my LONG ago post, was. that I would post my activity more with updates how this year went.  That didn't happen.

What did happen was one long test (for me), trying to dive into a different culture so different from what I am used to, it took me aback and made me realize a few things.

  • Dislocated students or students of migrant workers are under a stress load different from residential / citizen students
  • These students consciously or subconsciously discriminate (white) skin/gender.
  • The culture developed a value set and behaved in a way I would not permit my own children to act.
I do like to modify stuff, but most of these students were not at grade level as I was told in my candidate interview.  There were also ethical conflicts I experienced, but will not focus on it here.  After my first week and after I did find out the following:
  1. No matter the student, they like play. It's important to understand what teachers think of play, is not what students think of play (usually anything not academic).  However they did like the #100game (thank you Sara Van Der Werf)
  2. They like to explore, whether they will tell you or not (most of the times NOT!!!). With these groups that struggled, they like concrete things, like building a paper tower (from Vex), working with experimental labs like Desmos,
  3. Traditional assignments (p.k.a. "homework") is &H!# to them (and unless you can create a compelling connection or why, only the most compliant students will do them).
  4. ALEKS(TM) is not everything it says it can do, (not the students' nor mine, necessarily. that requires FORMAL training to know the ins and outs, and should not be overused as it has been.)
  5. Your lists, curated resources, and bookmarks will mean NOTHING to the next group.  Each class has its own sense of learning as they come in and defined by how crazy or boring you make it (thanks Dave Burgess).
So I considered I failed to teach to get them to learn. (Yes there are two sides of this coin).  I agree with Sara Van Der Werf's pedgogy of homogenous teaching (i.e., no ability grouping), but there came a point which when I presented something with students for them to struggle a little (which due to their aptitude was a small proximal zone), they wouldn't struggle, they would defiantly quit and accuse me of not teaching them.

I thought it WAS me, (despite my years and experience), but then I dug a little deeper into their backgrounds.  They actually don't want to be babied, but because of culture, behavior, and academic mixes, it made the perfect storm when this teacher FORCED them to think without a rule, algorithm, or recipe for solving, other than steps to think critically.  I have read and have personally interviewed (informally) employers who don't care if they can remember the Spanish-American war, or Pythagorean's Theorem, but if they can solve problems independently.  I will take more notes from https://www.saravanderwerf.com/green-reference-sheets/ on this, but I think I am on the right track to make the students think through things, rather than just an answer.
As I leave this district (no I am not staying, am going back to my home district from which I was on leave), I hope that the students have at least thought of math more than just an answer, but as a way to notice patterns, describe those patterns, and generalize patterns, then I feel they learned more math than any standardized test will show.  I did finish with a scavenger hunt, hoping they have some fun with that (like, what is Pi?)

Til I chalk again, 
Mr. Shel

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Hope for the next standards....

  Though the picture represents a different reason for my mug smile (taken in May 2022), it makes me feel the same way to try to continue to hope for the future of math standards.   Currently we are working underneath the 2007 Minnesota Math Standards, and version III of the new standards have been out for comment by the public.  Before, there were general ideas what was supposed to be presented to Algebra 1, Algebra 2, Geometry, upper standards (advanced data and statistics), but yet did not account for the College Now or other preparatory math many schools have implemented to be competitive. Here's a case example of hope for improvement.  Currently I teach Algebra 1 to the eighth graders in our district.  The curriculum we have is very rigorous (that is to say, the book focuses on rational exponents), and gives students little practice with integer exponents to build their confidence.  This gap, paired with a low numeracy and low fraction exposure fr...
Post a Comment
Read more

Incognito

Oh my... I have operated under the radar for the last year . There are so many things that have happened. For one, my post from winter quarter disappeared. Can't remember everything, so here goes... The picture you see is of my daughter being ready for summer camp before I left her for the week.  I realize that I will yet again be teaching college now algebra (this was ladt fall). . Based on my last experience I was not excited to do what I had done the previous year. However when the school year started, I then realized how sweet a schedule I actually had.  Actually this year's college now class was very concerned about their learning. There were a few, of course, that tried to command my attention, and I reminded them of course, this was a college-level class which required college level expectations. There was also a question whether or not I would return the following year and if so what capacity would I be teaching. It made me look for other possibilities well still ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Times of Transition

  I used to DESIRE to dig into research and to experiment and try a hypothesis in my classroom.  Since COVID I have felt complacent and unsupported to try anything.  This is the danger of not just the pandemic, but ANY major situation. Then I also became involved with MCTM and worked with people whose desire was to make math more connected again.  There were several feeling the same way as I did, and for once that gave some comfort.   I've discovered through personal study and investment in my thinking habits, (as mentioned in previous posts) that I am an Architect.  Not by trade, but by mindful construction of the "Big Picture" and commanding the tools, resources, and assets I am connected to make it happen. Not to brag, far from it, for Architects also are behind the scenes people, and some have the opposite of superiority complex; that is to say, an inferiority complex.   This is a dangerous feeling to have, especially if one is in a competiti...
Post a Comment
Read more